High-speed pursuit of stolen gold Chevy Impala


The audio reports a police chase of a stolen gold Chevy Impala speeding through Roseville and Citrus Heights, running red lights and exceeding 100 mph.
Audio|Source: Roseville Police and Fire
02:38
Transcript:
908, that vehicle is clear current, 2018KW. At a second row. Okay, so that's a external site. Okay. So we have a unit in pursuit of a vehicle on Vernon. I think it's citrus heights solo unit pursuing a gray Impala. They're gone by Vernon Street. Sam 16, break. Are you good with me doing? 704 from Lincoln 6A. If they're solo and then break the main, can you figure out what they have? A firm is going to be a gold Chevy and Paula 10-8-51[1], Licolute of 7. King, Victor, Mary, 672. Lassing downtown Vernon. They were heading towards Douglas. No, he's eastbound at Judah. I can't see the vehicle. I'm still trying to catch up to the unit. Thank you. 104. I think I just saw him southbound Rumorside. Negative. I'm still behind him. Eastbound Douglas. He's hitting Peggle Pass now. Will you inquire with citricides to see if they have units respondent? Lincoln Six, Citriciite is currently in pursuit. They're not requesting our assistance at this time. Lake and fix that copy. So the Roseway units, go ahead and drop out of that. Westbound Kirby and it's blocked out. Copy? 974 for info that PD unit was in excess of 100 when he was in that pursuit. 10-4[2]. It looks like they ran a couple red lights already. The original units per Citrus. The vehicle is now runway, westbound Kirby, passing Orlando. For both the flockets, we got the stolen vehicle that Citrus is pursued.
Police codes explained
The following codes appeared in the transcript and are explained below:
[1]
10-8-51: Stolen Vehicle
[2]
10-4: Acknowledgement
Disclaimer:
This was transcribed by AI and may contain errors. Please verify the information independently.
Location mentioned:
Vernon St, Roseville, CA 95678
This shows a Google Street View of the area near the location, which might not be the exact address.
Correct
Incorrect