Ex-partner allegedly took car keys violating protection order 

Transcript:
Be clear, stop. 1-4-5-1-2-1. 3-6-25, response at 2649 State Highway 7. Cross, they're going to be Dingman Hill Road in tunnel lane. see (name withheld) at that location. He states he received an order of protection against his ex-girlfriend, (name withheld), and to this point she'd resided there. He left the residence so she could move out and return and states his car keys are now missing. So he believes she must have gone back to the house and removed his car keys and states it is his. It is a violation of the order of protection. However, he has not seen her there or has no evidence that she was at the location. They both stay away. Clear stop. If I won't stay here. See (name withheld) at that location. He states he received an order of protection against his ex-girlfriend, (name withheld), and to this point she'd resided there. He left the residence so she could move out and return and states his car keys are now missing. So he believes she must have gone back to the house and removed his car keys and states it is his. It is a violation of the order of protection. However, he has not seen her there or has no evidence that she was at the location. They both stay away.

Disclaimer:
This was transcribed by AI and may contain errors. Please verify the information independently.