Driver violates protective order by transporting protected person, Fairmount IN
During a traffic stop near east 900 south, the driver was found to be violating a protective order by having a protected person in the vehicle. Officers waited for a ride to arrive for the involved parties. Charges for invasion of privacy are being prepared.
Audio|Source: Wabash, Huntington, Miami and Grant Counties Public Safety
02:45
Transcript:
00:00
Just 43. That address I was at was near east 900 south.
00:03
54 east, just 900 south.
00:05
There's a negative check, negative contact made.
00:09
Lights are on.
00:10
Vehicles are there and warm to the touch.
00:13
By (name withheld) is just avoiding us.
00:15
I can let the voice owner, TX.
00:17
I'll be 108 for now.
00:24
8.20.
00:30
How about tail light?
00:33
They're on now.
00:34
Vehicles here, nothing located.
00:40
208.
00:43
3521, the ride is arrived.
00:50
The ride has arrived.
00:56
P. T-521.
01:00
251, you have traffic?
01:11
Okay, 21, you want to call?
01:20
Permanent has been for a while.
01:26
Going to call, can't advise further?
01:30
Travis Stop.
01:31
The driver was in violation of a protective order.
01:38
Hey.
01:42
I guess that was for 22, go ahead.
01:46
I have a (name withheld) on the phone.
01:49
Five,
01:54
21 stuff.
01:59
Through myself.
02:02
8522.
02:07
No,
02:10
violation.
02:12
Miami Canal.
02:14
2521.
02:17
2521.
02:24
As a shift change was 11th.
02:27
I was on a traffic stop at Miami Canal.
02:31
The driver had a protected party in his vehicle with him.
02:34
We were waiting on a ride.
02:37
Ending case summary is going to be 01-1-031.
02:42
I'll be 10-8[1].
02:43
I'll be long-forming charges for invasion of privacy.
Police codes explained
The following codes appeared in the transcript and are explained below:
[1]
10-8: In service / Available for calls
Disclaimer:
This transcript was automatically generated and may contain inaccuracies. Please verify the information independently.
